(PC) Vargas v. Gonzales et al
| 1:2020cv01634 |
| November 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING 16 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER DISMISSING Plaintiff's Complaint; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 7 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 04/01/2021. CASE CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
16
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint 1 be dismissed without leave to amend as frivolous; recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order be denied 7 ; ORDER for Clerk to assign District Judge signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/17/2021. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Objections to F&R due within 21-Days. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:20-cv-2112 KJM CKD) to Fresno (1:20-cv-1634 EFG) signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/18/2020(Henshaw, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PC) Vargas v. Gonzales et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
