Torres, et al. v. Rexel USA, Inc.
| Tawni Vandagriff and Gerardo Torres |
| Rexel USA, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv01697 |
| December 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Barbara A McAuliffe |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Rexel USA, Inc. re #3 Civil New Case Documents, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #1 Notice of Removal, #4 Notice of Errata. (Claxton, Linda)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of ERRATA by Rexel USA, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal,.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Claxton, Linda)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/2/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Order re Consent, #4 VDRP) (Rivera, O)
|
|
Filing 2
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Rexel USA, Inc.. (Claxton, Linda)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE of REMOVAL from Stanislaus Superior Court, case number CV-20-004823 by Gerardo Torres, Tawni Vandagriff. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9278519) (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Linda Claxton, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Linda Claxton, #3 Declaration of Jonathan Plotkin, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Claxton, Linda)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
