(HC) Bettencourt v. Spencer
| 1:2020cv01833 |
| December 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING 10 Findings and Recommendations, DISMISSING Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Assign District Judge and CLOSE CASE and DECLINING TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/8/2021. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
10
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Assign District Judge signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/14/2021. Referred to Judge Unassigned DJ. Objections to F&R due within Thirty (30) Days. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER DENYING 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/6/2021. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:20-cv-2459 GGH) to Fresno (1:20-cv-1833 EPG) signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/29/2020. (Henshaw, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (HC) Bettencourt v. Spencer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
