Schwartzenberger v. ConsumerXpress LLC, d/b/a CAC Services
Plaintiff: Shawn Schwartzenberger
Defendant: ConsumerXpress LLC, d/b/a CAC Services
Case Number: 1:2021at00545
Filed: May 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ConsumerXpress LLC, d/b/a CAC Services by Shawn Schwartzenberger. Attorney Arbuckle, Melinda added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9600993) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Arbuckle, Melinda)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schwartzenberger v. ConsumerXpress LLC, d/b/a CAC Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ConsumerXpress LLC, d/b/a CAC Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn Schwartzenberger
Represented By: Melinda Arbuckle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?