Dallene Rocarro, deceased, by and through her personal representative and successor in interest, Michael Anderton et al v. Covenant Living West et al
Dallene Rocarro, deceased, by and through her personal representative and successor in interest, Michael Anderton, Michael Anderton, Joe Anderton and Teresa Fazio |
Covenant Living West Doing business as Brandel Manor, a California Skilled Nursing Facility, Covenant Living Communities & Services and Does 1-25, inclusive |
1:2021at00920 |
September 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Other Statutory Actions |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Stanislaus Superior Court, case number CV-21-004540 by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9836022) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Removal - State Court Documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplement Certificate of Service Re Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Notice Notice to Adverse Party of Removal, #5 Supplement Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Defendants' Notice of Removal, #6 Exhibit 1 to 10 in Support of Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice, #7 Exhibit 11 to 25 in Support of Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice, #8 Exhibit 26 to 34 in Support of Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice)(Kanno, Rita) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.