USA v. Howen et al
| United States of America |
| Lawrence A. Howen and Nor-Cal Pharmacies, Inc. Doing business as Lockeford Drug |
| 1:2021cv00106 |
| January 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Stanley A Boone |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 841 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER CONTINUING MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/16/2021. Scheduling Conference is continued from 5/6/2021 to 11/9/2021 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. The parties shall file a joint scheduling report seven (7) days prior to the scheduling conference.(Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/15/2021: (Text Only Entry) The parties are advised that pursuant to General Order No. 617, addressing the public health emergency posed by the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak, all civil motions set for hearing before District Judge Dale A. Drozd will be decided on the papers. The parties should not contact Judge Drozd's chambers to inquire about whether a hearing on a pending motion will be held. If the court determines that a hearing is necessary, the court will issue an order to specially set the motion for hearing by telephone or video conference. In accordance with Judge Drozd's Standing Order in Light of Judicial Emergency in the Eastern District of California, the hearing date selected by the movant will continue to govern the deadlines for opposition and reply briefs pursuant to Local Rule 230(c). (Thorp, J)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to DISMISS by Lawrence A. Howen. Motion Hearing set for 4/20/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Justin D. Hein in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Certificate of Record Certificate of Interested Parties, #3 Consent Form Decline of Jurisdiction of United States Magistrate Judge)(Hein, Justin) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/17/2021. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and finding good cause, Defendant shall file a responsive pleading on or before March 12, 2021. (Gonzales, V)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order, served on Justin D. Hein. (Gonzales, V) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint; Order by Lawrence A. Howen. (Hein, Justin) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Justin D. Hein on behalf of Lawrence A. Howen. Attorney Hein, Justin D. added. (Hein, Justin) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 5/6/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Maldonado, C) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Lawrence A. Howen, Nor-Cal Pharmacies, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Steven S. Tennyson* *501 I St. Suite 10-100* *Sacramento, CA 95814*. (Maldonado, C) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tennyson, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
