Yang v. Boudreaux et al
| Pheng Yang |
| Tulare County, Hood, Pugh, Hernandez, Verenzuela, Matthew Williams, Henderson and Mike Boudreaux |
| 1:2021cv00148 |
| February 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Barbara A McAuliffe |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 5/11/2021 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Pugh, Tulare County, Verenzuela, Matthew Williams* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *William L. Schmidt* *Attorney at Law* *P.O. Box 25001* *Fresno, CA 93729*. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Mike Boudreaux, Henderson, Hernandez, Hood* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *William L. Schmidt* *Attorney at Law* *P.O. Box 25001* *Fresno, CA 93729*. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS against All Defendants by Pheng Yang. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9400614) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schmidt, William)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
