(HC) Major v. Unknown
1:2021cv00166 |
February 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING 12 Findings and Recommendations, Dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Directing Clerk of Court to Assign District Judge and Close Case, and Declining to Issue Certificate of Appealability signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/15/2021. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 12 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/30/21. Referred to Judge UnassignedDJ. Objections to F&R Due Within Thirty Days. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 8 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Petition Should Not be Dismissed, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/4/2021. Show Cause Response due within thirty (30) days. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 4 ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:21-cv-0077 JDP HC) to Fresno (1:21-cv-0166 SAB HC) signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 2/10/2021. (Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (HC) Major v. Unknown | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.