(HC) Jackson v. Pfeiffer
Deshawn Jackson |
Christian Pfeiffer |
1:2021cv00250 |
February 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Dale A Drozd |
Sheila K Oberto |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 JUDGMENT dated *4/9/2021* pursuant to order. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING #6 Findings and Recommendations, DISMISSING Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Assign District Judge for Purpose of Closing Case (the new case number is 1:21-cv-00250-DAD-SKO) and Then Enter Judgment and Close Case, and DECLINING to Issue Certificate of Appealability, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/9/2021. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations, #11 Judgment served on Deshawn Jackson. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 9 OBJECTIONS to #6 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS by Petitioner Deshawn Jackson. (Maldonado, C) |
Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/16/2021. Objections to F&R due within 30-Days. (Lundstrom, T) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order on Motion for Extension served on Deshawn Jackson. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 7 MOTION for EXTENSION OF TIME by Deshawn Jackson. (Maldonado, C) |
Filing 6 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss Successive Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Assign District Judge signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 02/25/2021. Referred to Judge Unassigned; Objections to F&R due within Twenty-One Days. (Flores, E) |
Filing 5 STANDING ORDER AND CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE. This case has been assigned to UnassignedDJ and Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The new case number is: 1:21-cv-250 NONE-SKO HC. (Flores, E) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, #6 Findings and Recommendations (Motion), served on Deshawn Jackson. (Flores, E) |
Filing 4 ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Deshawn Jackson signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 02/24/2021. (Flores, E) |
Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 3/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Flores, E) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #4 Order Authorizing IFP Status served on Deshawn Jackson. (Flores, E) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Deshawn Jackson. (Flores, E) |
Filing 1 (2254) PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Christian Pfeiffer by Deshawn Jackson.(Flores, E) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (HC) Jackson v. Pfeiffer | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Deshawn Jackson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Christian Pfeiffer | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.