Velazquez v. Ford Motor Company
Arturo Velazquez |
Ford Motor Company |
1:2021cv00258 |
February 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Dale A Drozd |
Erica P Grosjean |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER Granting #11 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand this Action for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/13/2021. Remanded to Kings County Superior Court. Copy of remand order sent. CASE CLOSED.(Maldonado, C) |
Filing 16 REPLY by Arturo Velazquez re #11 Motion to Remand,. (Kaufman, Joseph) |
Filing 15 OPPOSITION by Ford Motor Company to #11 Motion to Remand,. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Hailey M. Rogerson ISO FMC's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #2 Exhibit Exhibits A-I to Declaration of Hailey M. Rogerson ISO FMC's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #3 Proof of Service)(Rogerson, Hailey) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS by Joseph A. Kaufman. (Kaufman, Joseph) |
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/29/2021: (Text Only Entry) The parties are advised that pursuant to General Order No. 617, addressing the public health emergency posed by the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak, all civil motions set for hearing before District Judge Dale A. Drozd will be decided on the papers. The parties should not contact Judge Drozd's chambers to inquire about whether a hearing on a pending motion will be held. If the court determines that a hearing is necessary, the court will issue an order to specially set the motion for hearing by telephone or video conference. In accordance with Judge Drozd's Standing Order in Light of Judicial Emergency in the Eastern District of California, the hearing date selected by the movant will continue to govern the deadlines for opposition and reply briefs pursuant to Local Rule 230(c). (Thorp, J) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: 13 Minute Order served on Joshua M. Ullman NCAED. (Thorp, J) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/27/2021: As a Motion to Remand, document #11 , has been noticed for hearing on 5/4/2021 before District Judge Dale A. Drozd, the scheduling conference currently set for 4/27/2021 before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean is vacated. Within ten days after the issuance of the ruling on the motion to remand, should the matter go forward, the parties are directed to contact Michelle Rooney (mrooney@caed.uscourts.gov) to re-set the scheduling conference. (Text Only Entry)(Rooney, M) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: 12 Minute Order served on Joshua M. Ullman NCAED. (Rooney, M) |
Filing 11 MOTION to REMAND by Arturo Velazquez. Motion Hearing set for 5/4/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Joseph Kaufman in Support of Plaintiff Arturo Velazquez's Motion for Remand, #2 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff Arturo Velazquez's Motion for Remand, #3 Exhibit Plaintiff Arturo Velazquez's Certificate and notice of Interested Parties)(Kaufman, Joseph) |
Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Rogerson, Hailey) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #7 Civil New Case Documents for DAD, #8 Docket Annotation. (Rogerson, Hailey) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Directing Attorneys Joshua M. Ullman and Joseph A. Kaufman to Submit Petition for Admission to Practice in the Eastern District of California. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 7 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 4/27/2021 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Jessen, A) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Civil New Case Documents for DAD, #8 Clerk's Notice served on Joseph A. Kaufman NCAED, Joshua M. Ullman NCAED. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Greg Gruzman on behalf of Ford Motor Company. Attorney Gruzman, Greg added. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Gruzman, Greg) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Hailey Rogerson on behalf of Ford Motor Company. Attorney Rogerson, Hailey added. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Rogerson, Hailey) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Spencer Peter Hugret on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Ford Motor Company (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 20c-0337 by Ford Motor Company =. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Spencer Hugret, #2 Declaration of Hailey Rogerson, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C , #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit , #11 Exhibit I, #12 Exhibit J, #13 Certificate of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) |
RECEIPT number 0972-9435394 for $402.00 for Ford Motor Company from Spencer Peter Hugret. (Jessen, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.