Trujillo v. Ibrahim et al
| Jose Trujillo |
| Lydia Joy Corr, Judith A. Vogt and Akram R. Ibrahim Doing business as Carniceria La Michoacana |
| 1:2021cv00311 |
| March 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Helena M Barch-Kuchta |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
TEXT ONLY ORDER. Having satisfied the requirements of Local Rule 182(g)the court approves the Notice of Substitution #12 and orders the substitution of attorney Richard Morin in place of David R. McNamara as counsel of record for defendant Lydia Joy Corr. The Clerk of Court shall correct the docket accordingly. signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 04/26/2021. (Barch-Kuchta, Helena)
|
|
Filing 13
TEXT ONLY ORDER. Having satisfied the requirements of Local Rule 182(g) the court approves the Notice of Substitution #11 and orders the substitution of attorney Richard Morin in place of attorney David R. McNamara as counsel of record for defendant Judith A. Vogt. The Clerk of Court shall correct the docket accordingly. signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 04/26/2021. (Barch-Kuchta, Helena)
|
| Filing 12 SUBSTITUTION of ATTORNEY - PROPOSED, submitted by Lydia Joy Corr. (Morin, Richard) |
| Filing 11 SUBSTITUTION of ATTORNEY - PROPOSED, submitted by Judith A. Vogt. (Morin, Richard) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Morin, Richard) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Lydia Joy Corr, Akram R. Ibrahim, Judith A. Vogt.(Morin, Richard) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Richard John Morin on behalf of Lydia Joy Corr, Akram R. Ibrahim, Judith A. Vogt. Attorney Morin, Richard John added. (Morin, Richard) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Akram R. Ibrahim served on 3/25/2021, answer due 4/15/2021. (Moore, Tanya) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Lydia Joy Corr, Judith A. Vogt. Attorney McNamara, David R. added. (McNamara, David) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Lydia Joy Corr served on 3/6/2021, answer due 3/29/2021. (Moore, Tanya) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Judith A. Vogt served on 3/6/2021, answer due 3/29/2021. (Moore, Tanya) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 9/23/2021 at 10:30 AM in Yosemite (JDP) before Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Order re Consent, #4 VDRP) (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Lydia Joy Corr, Akram R. Ibrahim, Judith A. Vogt* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Tanya E. Moore* *300 S. First Street* *Suite 342* *San Jose, CA 95113*. (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT asserting denial of right of access under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) against All Defendants by Jose Trujillo. Attorney Moore, Tanya E. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9448333) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, Tanya) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
