Trujillo v. Harsarb Inc et al
Jose Trujillo |
Harsarb Inc Doing business as A1 Step & Save and Harsarb Firm LLC |
1:2021cv00342 |
March 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Stanley A Boone |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Harsarb Firm LLC served on 4/12/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. (Moore, Tanya) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Harsarb Inc served on 4/12/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. (Moore, Tanya) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 6/10/2021 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Maldonado, C) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Harsarb Firm LLC, Harsarb Inc* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Tanya E. Moore* *Moore Law Firm, P.C.* *300 South First St., Ste. 342* *San Jose, CA 95113*. (Maldonado, C) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT asserting denial of right of access under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) against All Defendants by Jose Trujillo. Attorney Moore, Tanya E. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9458186) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, Tanya) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.