(SS) Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Alice Marie Rodriguez |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2021cv00463 |
| March 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Barbara A McAuliffe |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER (TEXT Only): The parties are hereby notified that pursuant to General Order Number 615, this action has been stayed pending further order of the court. See E.D. Cal. G.O. No. 615, paragraphs 6, 10. Minute order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/12/2021. CASE STAYED. (Valdez, E)
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Commissioner of Social Security served on 4/1/2021, answer due 6/1/2021. (Maldonado, C)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER AND CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE. This case has been assigned to District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. The new case number is: 1:21-cv-00463-DAD-BAM. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 7
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Pena, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF SUBMITTING SERVICE DOCUMENTS to the U.S. Marshal by Alice Marie Rodriguez pursuant to order of the court. (Pena, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL; Consent or Decline due by 6/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form, #3 USM Social Security Instructions) (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Jonathan Omar Pena* *Pena & Bromberg, Attorneys at Law* *2440 Tulare St., Suite 320* *Fresno, CA 93721*. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/24/2021. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Alice Marie Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pena, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 1
SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Alice Marie Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pena, Jonathan)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (SS) Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alice Marie Rodriguez | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Omar Pena |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
