(SS) Vick v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Shelly Lynnette Vick
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2021cv00491
Filed: March 24, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Stanley A Boone
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 402
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER STAYING CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/12/2021, Case stayed(Hernandez, M)
May 11, 2021 Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Commissioner of Social Security served on 5/7/2021, answer due 7/6/2021. (Jessen, A)
May 3, 2021 Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Pena, Jonathan)
May 3, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE OF SUBMITTING SERVICE DOCUMENTS to the U.S. Marshal by Shelly Lynnette Vick pursuant to order of the court. (Pena, Jonathan)
April 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL; Consent or Decline due by 7/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form, #3 USM Social Security Instructions) (Marrujo, C)
April 26, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Jonathan Omar Pena* *Pena & Bromberg, Attorneys at Law* *2440 Tulare St., Suite 320* *Fresno, CA 93721*. (Marrujo, C)
April 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #4 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Directing Clerk of Court to Issue Summons, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/23/2021. (Marrujo, C)
April 12, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Shelly Lynnette Vick. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pena, Jonathan)
March 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DENYING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP without Prejudice and REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Long Form Application; Twenty Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Long Form IFP Application)(Sant Agata, S)
March 24, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Shelly Lynnette Vick. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pena, Jonathan)
March 24, 2021 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Shelly Lynnette Vick. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pena, Jonathan)
March 24, 2021 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Maldonado, C)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (SS) Vick v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelly Lynnette Vick
Represented By: Jonathan Omar Pena
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?