(SS) Vick v. Commissioner of Social Security
Shelly Lynnette Vick |
Commissioner of Social Security |
1:2021cv00491 |
March 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Stanley A Boone |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER STAYING CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/12/2021, Case stayed(Hernandez, M) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Commissioner of Social Security served on 5/7/2021, answer due 7/6/2021. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Pena, Jonathan) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF SUBMITTING SERVICE DOCUMENTS to the U.S. Marshal by Shelly Lynnette Vick pursuant to order of the court. (Pena, Jonathan) |
Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL; Consent or Decline due by 7/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form, #3 USM Social Security Instructions) (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Jonathan Omar Pena* *Pena & Bromberg, Attorneys at Law* *2440 Tulare St., Suite 320* *Fresno, CA 93721*. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #4 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Directing Clerk of Court to Issue Summons, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/23/2021. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 4 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Shelly Lynnette Vick. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pena, Jonathan) |
Filing 3 ORDER DENYING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP without Prejudice and REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Long Form Application; Twenty Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Long Form IFP Application)(Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Shelly Lynnette Vick. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pena, Jonathan) |
Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Shelly Lynnette Vick. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pena, Jonathan) |
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Maldonado, C) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (SS) Vick v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shelly Lynnette Vick | |
Represented By: | Jonathan Omar Pena |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.