(SS) Carrisoza v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Natalie Carrisoza |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2021cv00646 |
| April 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Helena M Barch-Kuchta |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER STAYING CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 4/26/2021 (TEXT ORDER ONLY) General Order No. 615 issued on April 14, 2020 requires a stay of all Social Security actions filed after February 1, 2020 and brought under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) until the Commissioner can begin normal operations at the Office of Appellate Hearings Operations and resume preparation of the copy of the certified administrative record (CAR). ACCORDINGLY, this action is stayed consistent with General Order No. 615. The stay will be automatically lifted when the Commissioner files the CAR in this action. Plaintiff may move to lift the stay by showing good cause, i.e. showing plaintiff lacks the income or resources necessary to meet minimum subsistence. (Dunbar-Kari, K)
|
|
Filing 7
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Newel, Melissa)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Natalie Carrisoza. Commissioner of Social Security served on 4/26/2021, answer due 6/25/2021. (Newel, Melissa)
|
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 7/23/2021. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Melissa Newel* *Newel Law* *2625 Alcatraz Ave., #132* *Berkeley, CA 94704*. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 4/20/2021. (Attachments: #1 USM Instructions) (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Natalie Carrisoza. (Newel, Melissa)
|
|
Filing 1
SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Natalie Carrisoza. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Newel, Melissa)
|
|
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Lundstrom, T)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (SS) Carrisoza v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Natalie Carrisoza | |
| Represented By: | Melissa Newel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
