Williams v. Jp World Enterprises Inc.
Plaintiff: Allan Williams
Defendant: Jp World Enterprises Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv00686
Filed: April 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale A Drozd
Referring Judge: Jennifer L Thurston
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Jp World Enterprises Inc. served on 6/7/2021, answer due 6/28/2021. (Handy, Russell)
June 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Handy, Russell)
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Jp World Enterprises Inc.. (Bogie, Darren)
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Bogie, Darren)
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Jp World Enterprises Inc.. Attorney Bogie, Darren J. added.(Bogie, Darren)
May 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Jp World Enterprises Inc. served on 5/12/2021, answer due 6/2/2021. (Handy, Russell)
April 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 7/21/2021 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Worksheet, #3 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #4 Consent Form, #5 VDRP) (Lundstrom, T)
April 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Jp World Enterprises Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Russell Handy* *Center for Disability Access* *8033 Linda Vista Road, Suite 200* *San Diego, CA 92111*. (Lundstrom, T)
April 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Allan Williams. Attorney Handy, Russell added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9563663) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Handy, Russell)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Jp World Enterprises Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Allan Williams
Represented By: Russell Handy
Represented By: Zachary Manning Best
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Represented By: Raymond Ballister, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jp World Enterprises Inc.
Represented By: Darren J. Bogie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?