Henderson v. Hamilton et al
| Dae Henderson, Jr. |
| Patrick Eaton, Jeffrey Y. Hamilton and Smittencamp |
| 1:2021cv00697 |
| April 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why the action should not be Dismissed for Plaintiff's Failure to Comply with the Court's Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 06/14/2021. (Show Cause Response due within 21-Day Deadline)(Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order to Show Cause served on Dae Henderson Jr.. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER DENYING without Prejudice #2 Application to Proceed without the Prepayment of Fees and REQUIRING Plaintiff to File an Amended Application within Thirty Days signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/3/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application)(Sant Agata, S)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order, served on Dae Henderson Jr.. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Surety Bond and MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Dae Henderson, Jr. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Dae Henderson, Jr.(Sant Agata, S)
|
|
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Sant Agata, S)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
