(SS) Galvan v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Veronica Galvan |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2021cv00738 |
| May 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Gary S Austin |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/17/2021: (Text Only Entry) The parties are hereby notified that pursuant to General Order Number 615, this action has been stayed pending further order of the court. See E.D. Cal. G.O. No. 615, 6, 10. (Apodaca, P)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF SUBMITTING SERVICE DOCUMENTS to the U.S. Marshal by Veronica Galvan pursuant to order of the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Rosales, Steven) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE REGARDING SUBMISSION OF SERVICE DOCUMENTS, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/10/2021. Plaintiff is directed to show cause within 7 days of the entry of this order why she did not comply with the deadline. Alternatively, Plaintiff is directed to submit the service documents specified in docket entry 6-1 (to the address listed atop page 1) and file the notice attached to docket entry 6-1 (page 2) confirming that she did so. (Apodaca, P)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk to Issue USM Instructions and Directing Plaintiff to Submit Service Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/27/2021. (Attachments: #1 USM Social Security Instructions) (Marrujo, C)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Steven Gilbert Rosales* *Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing* *12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115* *Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670*. (Gonzalez, R) |
|
Filing 4
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL; Consent or Decline due by 8/13/2021. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/10/2021. (Marrujo, C)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Veronica Galvan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rosales, Steven) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT For Review Of Final Decision Of The Commissioner Of Social Security against Commissioner of Social Security by Veronica Galvan. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of interested parties, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rosales, Steven) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Rivera, O) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (SS) Galvan v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Veronica Galvan | |
| Represented By: | Steven Gilbert Rosales |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
