Sterling et al v. Redwood Springs Healthcare Center, LLC et al
| Monica Sterling, Louis Soliz and Sylvia Jones |
| Redwood Springs Healthcare Center, Spruce Holdings, LLC, Theresa Russel, Richard Soliz, Angela Hernandez and Theresa Russell |
| 1:2021cv00872 |
| June 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/30/2021: (Text Only Entry) Due to the pending motion(s), the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 8/24/2021, is CONTINUED to 3/15/2022, at 9:30 AM, in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties SHALL file their joint scheduling report 7 days prior to the conference. (Kusamura, W)
|
| Filing 10 REPLY by Monica Sterling to RESPONSE to #6 Motion to Remand,. Attorney Stirrup, Adam B. added. (Stirrup, Adam) |
| Filing 9 REQUEST for JUDICIAL NOTICE by Redwood Springs Healthcare Center, Spruce Holdings, LLC in re #8 Opposition to Motion. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit H, #8 Exhibit I, #9 Exhibit J, #10 Exhibit K, #11 Exhibit L, #12 Exhibit M, #13 Exhibit N, #14 Exhibit O, #15 Exhibit P, #16 Exhibit Q, #17 Exhibit R, #18 Exhibit S, #19 Exhibit T, #20 Exhibit U, #21 Exhibit V, #22 Exhibit W, #23 Exhibit X, #24 Exhibit Y, #25 Exhibit Z, #26 Exhibit AA, #27 Exhibit BB, #28 Exhibit CC, #29 Exhibit DD, #30 Exhibit EE, #31 Exhibit FF, #32 Exhibit GG, #33 Exhibit HH, #34 Exhibit II, #35 Exhibit JJ, #36 Exhibit KK, #37 Exhibit LL, #38 Exhibit OO, #39 Exhibit PP, #40 Exhibit QQ, #41 Exhibit RR)(Topol, Evan) |
| Filing 8 OPPOSITION by Redwood Springs Healthcare Center, Spruce Holdings, LLC to #6 Motion to Remand,. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Kim S. Cruz in Support of Opposition)(Topol, Evan) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) The parties are informed that pursuant to Local Rule 302 and the Standing Order Re Judicial Emergency [2-2], the recently-filed motion to remand #6 will be heard and decided by the undersigned. No hearing will be calendared, and the matter will be decided on the papers. The hearing date chosen by the filing party serves only to set the opposition and reply filing deadlines. A written decision will issue as soon as is practicable in light of the Court's extraordinarily heavy caseload signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on July 6, 2021.(Munoz, I)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to REMAND by Sylvia Jones. Motion Hearing set for 8/5/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 4 before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Points and Authorities Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Moion to Remand)(Paboojian, Warren) |
|
Filing 5
STIPULATION and ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/8/2021. (Kusamura, W)
|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint by Redwood Springs Healthcare Center, Spruce Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Stipulation to Extend Time)(Cruz, Kim) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Ryan G. Canavan on behalf of Redwood Springs Healthcare Center, Spruce Holdings, LLC. Attorney Canavan, Ryan G. added. (Canavan, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 8/24/2021 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Tulare Superior Court, case number VCU286688 by Spruce Holdings, LLC. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9630293) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Defendant's Removal, #3 Exhibit A to Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Exhibit B to Request for Judicial Notice, #5 Exhibit C to Request for Judicial Notice, #6 Exhibit D to Request for Judicial Notice, #7 Exhibit E to Request for Judicial Notice, #8 Exhibit F to Request for Judicial Notice, #9 Exhibit G to Request for Judicial Notice, #10 Exhibit H to Request for Judicial Notice, #11 Exhibit I to Request for Judicial Notice, #12 Exhibit J to Request for Judicial Notice, #13 Exhibit K to Request for Judicial Notice, #14 Exhibit L to Request for Judicial Notice, #15 Exhibit M to Request for Judicial Notice, #16 Exhibit N to Request for Judicial Notice, #17 Exhibit O to Request for Judicial Notice, #18 Exhibit P to Request for Judicial Notice, #19 Exhibit Q to Request for Judicial Notice, #20 Exhibit R to Request for Judicial Notice, #21 Exhibit S to Request for Judicial Notice, #22 Exhibit T to Request for Judicial Notice, #23 Exhibit U to Request for Judicial Notice, #24 Exhibit V to Request for Judicial Notice, #25 Exhibit W to Request for Judicial Notice, #26 Exhibit X to Request for Judicial Notice, #27 Exhibit Y to Request for Judicial Notice, #28 Exhibit Z to Request for Judicial Notice, #29 Exhibit AA to Request for Judicial Notice, #30 Exhibit BB to Request for Judicial Notice, #31 Exhibit CC to Request for Judicial Notice, #32 Exhibit DD to Request for Judicial Notice, #33 Exhibit EE to Request for Judicial Notice, #34 Exhibit FF to Request for Judicial Notice)(Topol, Evan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
