Brooke v. Sai Ashish Inc.
Plaintiff: Theresa Brooke
Defendant: Sai Ashish Inc. a California corporation Doing business as Ramada by Wyndham Fresno Northwest
Case Number: 1:2021cv00967
Filed: June 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Stanley A Boone
Referring Judge: Anthony W Ishii
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SERVE DEFENDANT WITH NOTICE OF HEARING. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within three (3) days, Plaintiff shall serve the Defendant with a notice that the hearing on the motion for default judgment has been reset, and file a proof of service with the Court. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/9/2021. (Apodaca, P)
August 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/6/2021: re #7 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Text Only Entry), THE COURT RESETS PLAINTIFF'S #7 MOTION for DEFAULT JUDGMENT :( Motion Hearing is set for 9/15/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone.(Hernandez, M)
August 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Theresa Brooke. Motion Hearing set for 9/13/2021 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Strojnik, Peter)
July 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to *Sai Ashish Inc.* (Flores, E)
July 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Sai Ashish Inc. by Theresa Brooke. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Strojnik, Peter)
July 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Sai Ashish Inc. served on 6/27/2021, answer due 7/19/2021. (Strojnik, Peter)
June 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 9/30/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Jessen, A)
June 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Sai Ashish Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Peter Kristofer Strojnik* *Law Offices of Peter Strojnik* *2415 E. Camelback Rd., Suite 700* *Phoenix, AZ 85016*. (Jessen, A)
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sai Ashish Inc. by Theresa Brooke. Attorney Strojnik, Peter Kristofer added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9658552) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Strojnik, Peter)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brooke v. Sai Ashish Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sai Ashish Inc. a California corporation Doing business as Ramada by Wyndham Fresno Northwest
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Theresa Brooke
Represented By: Peter Kristofer Strojnik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?