Samatria McCuistion vs DaVita, Inc.
| Samatria McCuistion |
| DaVita, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00985 |
| June 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 JOINT RULE 26(F) REPORT and PROPOSED ORDER by DaVita, Inc. (Sevilla, Angelito) Modified on 8/17/2021 (Coll, A). |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by DaVita, Inc. re #6 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (Sevilla, Angelito) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by DaVita, Inc. re #5 Consent/Decline of Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction,. (Sevilla, Angelito) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant DaVita, Inc.. (Sevilla, Angelito) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Morales, Gonzalo) |
| Filing 4 Attn: Attorneys Chantal McCoy Payton, NCAED and Laurel N. Holmes, NCAED please see attached Attorney Petition for Admission. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Civil New Case Documents, served on Laurel N. Holmes NCAED, Chantal McCoy Payton NCAED. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Docket Annotation served on Laurel N. Holmes NCAED, Chantal McCoy Payton NCAED. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by DaVita, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil New Case Documents,. (Sevilla, Angelito) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 8/24/2021 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Kings County Superior Court, case number 21C-0154 by DaVita, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9661355) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Lessie Burks Williams, #3 Declaration of La Sonya Richmond, #4 Declaration of Angel R. Sevilla, #5 Exhibit A to Declaration of Angel R. Sevilla, #6 Exhibit B to Declaration of Angel R. Sevilla, #7 Exhibit C to Declaration of Angel R. Sevilla)(Sevilla, Angelito) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Samatria McCuistion vs DaVita, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Samatria McCuistion | |
| Represented By: | Chantal McCoy Payton, NCAED |
| Represented By: | Laurel N. Holmes, NCAED |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DaVita, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Angelito Remo Sevilla |
| Represented By: | Gonzalo Morales |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
