Conde v. Department of the Treasury et al
| Christopher Conde |
| Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service |
| 1:2021cv01072 |
| July 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE WHY THE ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/26/2021.(Kusamura, W)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order to Show Cause served on Christopher Conde. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER DENYING Without Prejudice #2 Application to Proceed Without the Prepayment of Fees and Requiring Plaintiff to File an Amended Application or Filing Fee Within Thirty (30) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/13/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application). (Jessen, A)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order served on Christopher Conde. (Jessen, A)
|
|
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Christopher Conde. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service by Christopher Conde. (Jessen, A)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
