Escovedo v. FCA US LLC
Dustin A. Escovedo |
FCA US LLC |
1:2021cv01090 |
July 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Dale A Drozd |
Erica P Grosjean |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE COURTS JURISDICTION OVER SETTLEMENTS, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/7/2021. (Filing Deadline: 11/19/2021)(Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for to Continue Court's Jurisdiction Over Settlement re #4 Notice of Acceptance with Offer of Judgment - ATY by Dustin A. Escovedo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation to Continue Court's Jurisdiction Over Settlement)(Dolin, Tionna) |
Filing 7 JUDGMENT dated *9/22/2021* pursuant to minute order (ECF No. 6). (Rivera, O) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) Given that plaintiff has accepted defendant's Rule 68 offer of judgment (Doc. No. #4 ), the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff pursuant to the terms stated within that offer. Thereafter, the Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this matter for the purposes of closure and then shall close this case signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on September 22, 2021. (Munoz, I) |
Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/16/2021: In light of the Notice of Acceptance of Defendant's Offer of Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 68 (ECF No. #4 ), the Initial Scheduling Conference set for 9/21/2021 is VACATED. (Text Only Entry)(Rooney, M) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of ACCEPTANCE with OFFER of JUDGMENT by Dustin A. Escovedo. (Dolin, Tionna) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by FCA US LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil New Case Documents,. (Shepardson, Scott) |
Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 9/21/2021 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Jessen, A) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Tulare Superior Court, case number VCU286064 by DUSTIN A. ESCOVEDO. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9710011) (Attachments: #1 Notice of Interested Parties, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Declaration of Scott S. Shepardson, #4 Declaration of Stephen T. Grimsrud)(Shepardson, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Escovedo v. FCA US LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dustin A. Escovedo | |
Represented By: | Tionna Dolin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: FCA US LLC | |
Represented By: | Scott Steven Shepardson |
Represented By: | Stephen T. Grimsrud |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.