Perez v. Cenlar FSB, et al.
| Yolanda Perez |
| Cenlar FSB and National Default Servicing Corporation (NDSC) |
| 1:2021cv01154 |
| July 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Banks and Banking |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
STIPULATION and ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT CENLAR FSB TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/26/2021. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/26/2021: (Text Only Entry) Before the Court is the parties' Stipulation Extending Time for Defendant Cenlar FSB to Respond to First Amended Complaint. (Doc. #5 .) The Court notes that while the proposed order was filed with the stipulation, the parties did not email an electronic copy of the proposed order to the Court's chambers, as required by Local Rule 137. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to send an electronic version of the proposed order in Microsoft Word format to SKOorders@caed.uscourts.gov by no later than August 27, 2021. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/24/2021: (Text Only Entry) The parties are advised that pursuant to Judge Drozd's Standing Order in Light of Judicial Emergency in the Eastern District of California, all civil motions set for hearing before District Judge Dale A. Drozd will be decided on the papers. The parties should not contact Judge Drozd's chambers to inquire about whether a hearing on a pending motion will be held. The hearing date selected by the movant will continue to govern the deadlines for opposition and reply briefs pursuant to Local Rule 230(c). (Thorp, J)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/24/2021: (Text Only Entry) Due to the pending motion(s), the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 10/21/2021, is CONTINUED to 6/16/2022, at 9:45 AM, in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties SHALL file their joint scheduling report 7 days prior to the conference. (Kusamura, W)
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION Extending Time for Defendant Cenlar FSB to Respond to First Amended Complaint by Cenlar FSB. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Coffield, Jessica) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to REMAND by Yolanda Perez. Motion Hearing set for 10/19/2021 at 09:30 AM in Chambers before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Complaint, #2 Exhibit Service of Notice of Summons, #3 Exhibit Temporary Restraining Order, #4 Exhibit Parties Stipulated on Vacating Order, #5 Exhibit Declaration of Non-Monetary, #6 Exhibit Defendant Cenlar filed CMCS, #7 Exhibit Defendant Demurrer)(Moy, Baldwin) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE., attorney Charles Nunley terminated (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Coffield, Jessica) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 10/21/2021 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Madera Superior Court, case number MCV083221 by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9737966) (Nunley, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
