Seever v. City of Modesto, et al.
Plaintiff: David Robert Seever
Defendant: City of Modesto, Joseph Lamantia and Galen Carroll
Case Number: 1:2021cv01373
Filed: September 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Erica P Grosjean
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: City of Modesto served on 11/1/2021, answer due 11/22/2021. (Fabbro, Steven)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF CLARIFICATION re district judge availability to hear matters in the Eastern District of California. (Jessen, A)
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Fabbro, Steven)
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER RELATING CASES and REASSIGNING District and Magistrate Judge, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/26/2021.(Martin-Gill, S)
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 12/14/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Lundstrom, T)
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Joseph Lamantia, Galen Carroll, City of Modesto* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Steven August Fabbro* *Law Offices of Steven A. Fabbro* *601 Montgomery Street, Ste 688* *San Francisco, CA 94111*. (Lundstrom, T)
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Modesto, City of Modesto Police Department, Joseph Lamantia, Galen Carroll by David Seever. Attorney Fabbro, Steven August added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9816508) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration)(Fabbro, Steven)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Seever v. City of Modesto, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Robert Seever
Represented By: Steven August Fabbro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Modesto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Lamantia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Galen Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?