(PC) Morris Lee Love v. Shaffer et al
Plaintiff: Morris Lee Love and Morris Lee Love, Jr.
Defendant: P. Shaffer, Van-Ness and B. Chism
Case Number: 1:2021cv01380
Filed: September 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Gary S Austin
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER WITHDRAWING Findings and Recommendations #6 ; acknowledging payment of $402.00 Filing Fee; DENYING Motion to Proceed IFP as moot #2 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/10/2021. (Lundstrom, T)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order served on Morris Lee Love Jr. (Lundstrom, T)
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order RECEIPT number #CAE100049478 $402.00 fbo Morris Lee Love Jr by Morris Lee Love Jr on 11/9/2021. (Lundstrom, T)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER OF CLARIFICATION re district judge availability to hear matters in the Eastern District of California. (Lundstrom, T)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order of Clarification served on Morris Lee Love Jr.. (Lundstrom, T)
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Flores, E)
October 6, 2021 Opinion or Order RE-SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, #6 Findings and Recommendations served on Morris Lee Love Jr. (Rivera, O)
October 6, 2021 Opinion or Order RE-SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Morris Lee Love Jr. (Rivera, O)
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, Inmate not here: #5 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case sent to Morris L. Love. (Martin-Gill, S)
October 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS to Wasco State Prison, P.O. Box 9900, Wasco, CA 93280 by Morris Lee Love, Jr. (Martin-Gill, S)
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, Inmate Not Here: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider sent to Morris Lee Love. Notice of Change of Address due by 12/6/2021. (Rivera, O)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER for Clerk to Randomly Assign District Judge to this Case; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending that Plaintiff's #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be Denied signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 09/20/2021. Referred to Judge Unassigned; Objections to F&R due within Fourteen-Days. (Flores, E)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER AND CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE. This case has been assigned to UnassignedDJ and Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin. The new case number is: 1:21-cv1380 NONE-GSA. (Flores, E)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Findings and Recommendations (Motion), #5 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Morris Lee Love. (Flores, E)
September 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Morris Lee Love (Martin-Gill, S)
September 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 10/21/2021 (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Martin-Gill, S)
September 17, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Morris Lee Love. (Martin-Gill, S)
September 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Morris Lee Love. (Martin-Gill, S)
September 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against B. Chism, P. Shaffer, Van-Ness by Morris Lee Love.(Martin-Gill, S)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Morris Lee Love v. Shaffer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Morris Lee Love
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Morris Lee Love, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: P. Shaffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Van-Ness
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B. Chism
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?