(PC) Khademi v. Jimmanz, et al.
Khademi Davood and Davood Khademi |
Jimmanz, Philpott, Victor Perez, Medical Director David K. Fennell, M.D., Todd Elwyn, Joseph Ranjh, Jesus - Perez, B Prespoza, Babak Tehrani, Lena Gamino, Denzel, Sumlin and Hayam |
1:2021cv01394 |
September 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Stanley A Boone |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 FIRST AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Denzel, Todd Elwyn, David K. Fennell, MD, Lena Gamino, Hayam, Jimmanz, Jesus - Perez, Victor Perez, Philpott, B Prespoza, Joseph Ranjh, Sumlin, Babak Tehrani by Davood Khademi.(Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 11 SCREENING ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff Leave to File an Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/19/2021. (First Amended Complaint due within 30-Day Deadline) (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint Form)(Martin-Gill, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #11 Screening Order, served on Davood Khademi. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 10 ORDER VACATING #8 Order to Show Cause, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/12/2021. (Rivera, O) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order served on Khademi Davood. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE to #8 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE by Davood Khademi. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 8 **VACATED PURSUANT TO #10 ORDER** ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why action should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies #1 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/24/2021. Show Cause Response due within 21-Days. (Lundstrom, T) Mod |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order to Show Cause served on Davood Khademi. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 7 ADDRESS UPDATED to PO Box 1050, Soledad, CA 93960 pursuant to Notice of Change of Address filed in 1:21-cv-1261-DAD-SKO(PC). (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application, #2 Trust Account Statement) (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 5 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Khademi Davood. (Lundstrom, T) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Khademi Davood. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 10/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Khademi Davood, CDC BN-6168 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsFresno@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Lundstrom, T) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Khademi Davood. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Khademi Davood. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Denzel, Todd Elwyn, David K. Fennell, MD, Lena Gamino, Hayam, Jimmanz, Jesus - Perez, Victor Perez, Philpott, B Prespoza, Joseph Ranjh, Sumlin, Babak Tehrani by Khademi Davood.(Lundstrom, T) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.