(PC) Avila v. Felder et al
Andrew Avila |
Michael A. Felder and California Correctional Health Care Services |
1:2021cv01510 |
October 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Barbara A McAuliffe |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT by Andrew Avila. (Maldonado, C) |
RECEIPT number #CAE100049596 $402.00 fbo Andrew Avila D-62751 by State of California on 12/6/2021. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING #7 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER DENYING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP; ORDERED that within 21-Days following the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall pay the $402.00 filing fee in full to proceed with the action, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/22/2021. (Case Management Deadline: 21-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations, served on Andrew Avila. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Flores, E) |
Filing 8 ORDER OF CLARIFICATION re district judge availability to hear matters in the Eastern District of California. (Lundstrom, T) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order of Clarification served on Andrew Avila. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 7 ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Randomly Assign District Judge to Action; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION that #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be Denied, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/20/2021. Referred to Judge Unassigned DJ. Objections to F&R Due Within Fourteen-Days. (Maldonado, C) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER AND CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE. This case has been assigned to UnassignedDJ and Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. The new case number is: 1:21-CV-01510-NONE-BAM. (Maldonado, C) |
Filing 5 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Andrew Avila (Martin-Gill, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Findings and Recommendations #6 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Andrew Avila. (Maldonado, C) |
Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 11/18/2021 (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Andrew Avila, CDC D-62751 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsFresno@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Martin-Gill, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Andrew Avila. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Andrew Avila. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against California Correctional Health Care Services, Michael A. Felder by Andrew Avila.(Martin-Gill, S) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.