Mallard-Warren v. Saint Agnes Medical Center et al
Gail Mallard-Warren, M.D. |
Saint Agnes Medical Center, Trinity Health Corporation, The Medical Staff of Saint Agnes Medical Center and Nancy Hollingsworth |
1:2021cv01530 |
October 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sheila K Oberto |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER OF CLARIFICATION re district judge availability to hear matters in the Eastern District of California. (Maldonado, C) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/25/2022 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Nancy Hollingsworth, Saint Agnes Medical Center, The Medical Staff of Saint Agnes Medical Center, Trinity Health Corporation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *DANIEL HOROWITZ* *LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL HOROWITZ* *PO Box 1547* *Lafayette, CA 94549*. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Gail Mallard-Warren. Attorney Horowitz, Daniel A. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9874560) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit to Complaint, #2 Exhibit DFEH Right to Sue Letter, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Horowitz, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.