Ento v. Washington, DC et al
| Christian David Ento |
| Washington, DC, Louis Steems, Saturaio Rios, George Ramirez and Ted Jones |
| 1:2021cv01537 |
| October 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Helena M Barch-Kuchta |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, Return to Sender, Insufficient Address, Unable to Forward: #3 Order, sent to Christian David Ento at 15 Silver Circle Road, Sacramento, CA 95823. Notice of Change of Address due by 1/13/2022. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER DENYING without Prejudice Plaintiff's #2 Motion to Proceed IFP; ORDER to Submit Completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Pay Filing Fee signed by Magistrate Judge Helena Barch-Kuchta on 10/25/2021. Twenty-One Day Deadline. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application Form)(Flores, E) Modified on 11/22/2021 (Dunbar-Kari, K).
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, served on Christian David Ento. (Flores, E)
|
|
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Christian David Ento. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Ted Jones, George Ramirez, Saturaio Rios, Louis Steems, Washington, DC by Christian David Ento. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Flores, E)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
