Herevia v. Nelson et al
Reynaldo Herevia |
Nathan Nelson and Letitia Nelson |
1:2021cv01563 |
October 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Dale A Drozd |
Sheila K Oberto |
Rent Lease & Ejectment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER Sua Sponte REMANDING Case to Fresno County Superior Court and DENYING Motions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #5 and #6 as MOOT, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/22/2021. (Copy of this order mailed to: B.F. Sisk Courthouse, 1130 O Street, Fresno, CA 93724)(Martin-Gill, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order, served on Letitia Nelson, Nathan Nelson. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Letitia Nelson, Nathan Nelson. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 6 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Letitia Nelson. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 5 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Nathan Nelson. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Letitia Nelson, Nathan Nelson (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Letitia Nelson, Nathan Nelson (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Letitia Nelson, Nathan Nelson (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Superior Court, County of Fresno, Case number 21CECL07303 filed by Letitia Nelson and Nathan Nelson.(Martin-Gill, S) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.