(PC) Dukes v. Soto et al
Plaintiff: Darnell Maurice Dukes
Defendant: Tammy Soto and John Pearce
Case Number: 1:2021cv01570
Filed: October 25, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Helena M Barch-Kuchta
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order RECEIPT number #CAE100049696 $402.00 fbo Darnell Maurice Dukes E-56356 by Tonia Gunn on 12/21/2021. (Martin-Gill, S)
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Deny Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Under 28 U.S.C. 1915; ORDER to Assign to District Judge, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 12/09/2021. Referred to Judge Unassigned DJ. Objections to F&R Due Within Fourteen-Days. (Maldonado, C)
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 AMENDED STANDING ORDER AND CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE. This case has been assigned to UnassignedDJ and Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta. The new case number is: 1:21-CV-01570-NONE-HBK. ORDER OF CLARIFICATION issued re district judge availability to hear matters in the Eastern District of California. (Attachments: #1 Clarification Order) (Maldonado, C)
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, #7 Findings and Recommendations served on Darnell Maurice Dukes. (Maldonado, C)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Flores, E)
October 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on CSP-Corcoran. (Maldonado, C)
October 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *10/25/2021*;Plaintiff's Consent or Decline due by 11/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Maldonado, C)
October 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Darnell Maurice Dukes. (Maldonado, C)
October 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT by Darnell Maurice Dukes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Maldonado, C)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Dukes v. Soto et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darnell Maurice Dukes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tammy Soto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Pearce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?