Beaton v. Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff: Paul Nivard Beaton
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Case Number: 1:2021cv01575
Filed: October 25, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Stanley A Boone
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Declare Plaintiff to be a Three-Strike Litigant and Revoke Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis Status Under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) re #1 Complaint filed by Paul Nivard Beaton signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/7/2021. Referred to Unassigned DJ. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Findings and Recommendations served on Paul Nivard Beaton. (Jessen, A)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS to California Medical Facility, P.O. Box 2000, Vacaville, CA 95696 by Paul Nivard Beaton. (Jessen, A)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Jessen, A)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF CLARIFICATION re district judge availability to hear matters in the Eastern District of California. (Maldonado, C)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order of Clarification served on Paul Nivard Beaton. (Maldonado, C)
October 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED: Consent or Decline due by 12/2/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Rivera, O)
October 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING #2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; ORDER DIRECTING Payment of Inmate Filing Fee by California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and DIRECTING Clerk of the Court to Issue Prisoner New Case Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/26/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (Rivera, O)
October 26, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order, #4 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Paul Nivard Beaton. (Rivera, O)
October 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Paul Nivard Beaton. (Jessen, A)
October 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Internal Revenue Service by Paul Nivard Beaton. (Jessen, A)
October 25, 2021 Opinion or Order APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Jessen, A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beaton v. Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul Nivard Beaton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?