Martinez, et al. v. Kaweah Delta Medical Center, et al.
Juana B. Martinez, Luisa Patgher and Maria E. Santillan |
Kaweah Delta Medical Center, Gregory Warner MD, Niraj M. Patel MD and United States of America |
1:2021cv01601 |
November 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Erica P Grosjean |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING #3 Defendant United States' Motion to Dismiss, Substitute and Remand, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/27/2021. REMANDING CASE to Tulare County Superior Court. Certified copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 15 MINUTES (Text Only) for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean: MOTION HEARING on defendant Niraj Patel, MD's, Motion to Dismiss, document #3 , held on 12/10/2021 with an order to follow. Plaintiffs' Counsel Jeremy Dobbins present. Defendants' Counsel Stacy Macias and Brodie Butland present. Court Reporter/CD Number: ECRO - Otilia Rosales. (Rooney, M) |
Filing 14 REPLY by Niraj M. Patel MD to RESPONSE to #3 Motion to Dismiss,. (Butland, Brodie) |
Filing 13 OPPOSITION by Juana B. Martinez to #3 Motion to Dismiss,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Government Claims - Date Stamped)(Dobbins, Jeremy) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/17/2021: Pursuant to the recent reassignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Grosjean subsequent to the parties' consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction, the Court re-sets the Motion to Dismiss, document #3 , for hearing on 12/10/2021 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Text Only Entry)(Rooney, M) |
Filing 11 CONSENT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE for all purposes to Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/15/2021. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/15/2021: In light of Plaintiffs' notice that Defendant Gregory Warner MD was dismissed from this matter before removal (ECF No. #9 ), the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Defendant Gregory Warner MD as an active Defendant on the docket. (Text Only Entry)(Rooney, M) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRIOR DISMISSAL by All Plaintiffs. (Dobbins, Jeremy) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/12/2021: Upon review of the docket, it is not clear whether Defendant Gregory Warner is an active party in this case. Accordingly, Plaintiff is directed to file a status report, no later than seven (7) days from the issuance of this minute order, addressing whether Defendant Gregory Warner is an active party in this case. (Text Only Entry)(Rooney, M) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Butland, Brodie) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) The parties are informed that, in the absence of complete consent, pursuant to Local Rule 302 and the Standing Order Re Judicial Emergency (Doc. No. #2 -1), the recently-filed motion to dismiss (Doc. No. #3 ) is re-set before the district judge. No hearing will be calendared, and the matter will be decided on the papers. The hearing date chosen by the filing party serves only to set the opposition and reply filing deadlines. The recently issued order of clarification (Doc. No. #2 -3) does not stay these filing deadlines. Rather, that order warns that the parties "should expect that no matter in [this] case will be addressed by a district judge" until further notice signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on November 9, 2021. (Munoz, I) |
Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Salinas, Richard) |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Dobbins, Jeremy) |
Filing 3 MOTION to DISMISS by Niraj M. Patel MD. Motion Hearing set for 12/10/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Motion and Motion to Substitute, Dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1), and Remand, #2 Exhibit A - Notice of State Court Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 233(l)(1), #3 Exhibit B - Declaration of Meredith Torres, #4 Exhibit SF95)(Butland, Brodie) |
Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/18/2022 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Clarification Order, #4 Consent Form, #5 VDRP) (Rivera, O) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Tulare County Superior Court, case number VCU279163 by Niraj M Patel MD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Certification regarding Scope of Employment, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Butland, Brodie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.