Gastelum v. Kohl's Department Stores Inc.
Plaintiff: Fernando Gastelum
Defendant: Kohl's Department Stores Inc. Doing business as Kohl's
Case Number: 1:2021cv01740
Filed: December 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Barbara A McAuliffe
Referring Judge: Jennifer L Thurston
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/26/2022. (Gonzalez, R)
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Standing Order served on Fernando Gastelum. (Gonzalez, R)
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Kohl's Department Stores Inc. served on 12/28/2021, answer due 1/18/2022. (Lundstrom, T)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Kohl's Department Stores Inc.. (Orr, Matthew)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ANSWER by Kohl's Department Stores Inc.. Attorney Orr, Matthew R added.(Orr, Matthew)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: Due to the appointment of Judge Jennifer L. Thurston to the position of U.S. District Judge, this action is reassigned from *Unassigned DJ* to District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston for all further proceedings. (Maldonado, C)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order Reassigning District Judge Thurston, served on Fernando Gastelum. (Maldonado, C)
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/9/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Clarification Order, #4 Consent Form, #5 Pro Se Informational Order) (Maldonado, C)
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Kohl's Department Stores Inc. * with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Fernando Gastelum* *209 W. 9th Street* *Casa Grande, AZ 85122*. (Maldonado, C)
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Civil New Case Documents, #2 Summons served on Fernando Gastelum. (Maldonado, C)
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kohl's Department Stores Inc. by Fernando Gastelum. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Maldonado, C)
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order RECEIPT number #CAE100049630 $402.00 fbo Fernando S Gastelum by Fernando S Gastelum on 12/8/2021. (Maldonado, C)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gastelum v. Kohl's Department Stores Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fernando Gastelum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kohl's Department Stores Inc. Doing business as Kohl's
Represented By: Matthew R Orr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?