Strohmaier v. Fresno VA
Bradford C. Strohmaier |
Fresno VA |
1:2021cv01746 |
December 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Erica P Grosjean |
Jennifer L Thurston |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/26/2022. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING #3 Findings and Recommendations Recommending that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be Denied signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/25/2022.(Sant Agata, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations, served on Bradford C. Strohmaier. (Sant Agata, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Standing Order served on Bradford C. Strohmaier. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 4 ORDER by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: Due to the appointment of Judge Jennifer L. Thurston to the position of U.S. District Judge, this action is reassigned from *Unassigned DJ* to District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston for all further proceedings. (Maldonado, C) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order Reassigning District Judge Thurston, served on Bradford C. Strohmaier. (Maldonado, C) |
Filing 3 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/20/2021 recommending as follows: 1) Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) be DENIED; and 2)Plaintiff be directed to pay the $402.00 filing fee in full if he wants to proceed with this action.These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States district judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Within twenty-one (21) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)). (Rooney, M) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Findings and Recommendations served on Bradford C. Strohmaier. (Rooney, M) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Bradford C. Strohmaier. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fresno VA by Bradford C. Strohmaier. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Jessen, A) |
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Jessen, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Strohmaier v. Fresno VA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Bradford C. Strohmaier | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Fresno VA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.