Impact Force, Inc. v. Graves
Impact Force, Inc. |
John Graves |
1:2021mc00025 |
March 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Stanley A Boone |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER Withdrawing Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Vacating Hearing and Directing Clerk of Court to Close Miscellaneous Action signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 04/15/2021. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E) |
Filing 5 WITHDRAWAL of #1 Motion to Compel,, filed by Impact Force, Inc.. (Scott, Allison) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Impact Force, Inc. re #3 Order,, Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings,, Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings,. (Scott, Allison) |
Filing 3 ORDER SETTING HEARING on #1 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Compliance With Subpoena and Request for Order to Show Cause Why Non-Party Should Not be Held in Contempt, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/24/2021. Motion Hearing set for 4/28/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Proof of Service due within three (3) days. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE: Attn: Allison M. Scott ***Please Pay Miscellaneous Filing Fee***Advance payment of the filing fee in the amount of $49.00 is required and should be submitted electronically using the event Payment of Fees. Your case will not be filed until the fee is paid (Local Rule 121c). If you wish to pay with cash, check or money order, the fee must be received by the clerk's office within 48 hours of lodging your complaint, or your documents will be deleted from the court's server. If you need assistance, please contact the CM/ECF help desk at 866-884-5444, or refer to the CM/ECF User's Manual on the court's website. (Martin-Gill, S) |
NEW MISCELLANEOUS CASE FILED Motion to Compel. (Flores, E) |
PAYMENT for miscellaneous case filing fee in the amount of $ 49, receipt number 0972-9494744. (Scott, Allison) |
Filing 1 MOTION to COMPEL Order to Show Cause Why Non-Party Dapper Cigar Company, LLC Should Not Be Held In Civil Contempt of Court by Impact Force, Inc.. Attorney Scott, Allison M. added. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Andrea Frailey, #2 Exhibit 1-A Dapper Subpoena Packet, #3 Exhibit 1-B Emails Between Frailey & Reith, #4 Exhibit 1-C Email From Hermon to Defense Counsel, #5 Exhibit 2 Complaint & Demand for Jury Trial W Exhibits, #6 Exhibit 3 Defendant's Supplemental Discovery Responses, #7 Exhibit 4 USPS Tracking Printout)(Scott, Allison) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Impact Force, Inc. v. Graves | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Impact Force, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Allison M. Scott |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: John Graves | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.