Grandhe, et al. v. United States of America
Petitioner: Janardhan Grandhe, CVPM Surgery Center, Inc. and Janardhan Grandhe, MD a Medical Corporation Doing business as Central Valley Pain Management
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 1:2021mc00063
Filed: July 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale A Drozd
Referring Judge: Sheila K Oberto
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits: IRS-Third Party
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7609
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to CLOSE the CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/26/2021. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
July 23, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by CVPM Surgery Center, Inc., Janardhan Grandhe, Janardhan Grandhe, MD. (Mears, Michael)
July 8, 2021 NEW MISCELLANEOUS CASE FILED. (Lundstrom, T)
July 7, 2021 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Petitioners CVPM Surgery Center, Inc., Janardhan Grandhe, Janardhan Grandhe, MD, a Medical Corporation, doing business as Central Valley Pain Management. (Mears, Michael)
July 7, 2021 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Petitioners CVPM Surgery Center, Inc., Janardhan Grandhe, Janardhan Grandhe, MD, a Medical Corporation, doing business as Central Valley Pain Management. (Mears, Michael)
July 7, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by CVPM Surgery Center, Inc., Janardhan Grandhe, Janardhan Grandhe, MD, a Medical Corporation, doing business as Central Valley Pain Management (Mears, Michael)
July 7, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for to Quash Internal Revenue Service Summons by CVPM Surgery Center, Inc., Janardhan Grandhe, Janardhan Grandhe, MD, a Medical Corporation, doing business as Central Valley Pain Management. Attorney Mears, Michael P. added. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A")(Mears, Michael)
July 7, 2021 PAYMENT for miscellaneous case filing fee in the amount of $ 49, receipt number ACAEDC-9694309. (Mears, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grandhe, et al. v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Janardhan Grandhe
Represented By: Michael P. Mears
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: CVPM Surgery Center, Inc.
Represented By: Michael P. Mears
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Janardhan Grandhe, MD a Medical Corporation Doing business as Central Valley Pain Management
Represented By: Michael P. Mears
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?