Davis v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
| Amaurian Davis |
| Amazon.com Services LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 1:2022at00495 |
| June 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of RELATED CASE(S) 1:18-cv-00120-DAD-BAM, USDC Central - 2:20-cv-09496-JVS-SHK, USDC Central - 5:20-cv-02368-JV-SHK, USDC Northern - 4:21-cv-02147-HSG, 1:21-cv-00667-BAK-BAM, USDC Northern - 3:22-cv-01161-AGT by Amazon.com Services LLC. (Cooney, Megan) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC. (Cooney, Megan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from San Joaquin Superior Court, case number STK-CV-UOE-2022-0004327 by Amaurian Davis. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10307827) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Colleen Liguori in Support of Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC's Notice of Removal of Class Action, #3 Declaration of Megan Cooney in Support of Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC's Notice of Removal of Class Action, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Exhibit E, #9 Exhibit F, #10 Proof of Service)(Cooney, Megan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
