American General Life Insurance Company v. Bushman et al
American General Life Insurance Company |
Sharon Bushman, Heather K. Litz and Micklos Lemons |
1:2022at00701 |
September 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by American General Life Insurance Company. (Burnite, John) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by American General Life Insurance Company (Burnite, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT IN INTERPLEADER against Sharon Bushman, Micklos Lemons, Heather K. Litz by American General Life Insurance Company. Attorney Burnite, John T. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10436585) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: The Annuity schedule page, #2 Exhibit 2: Annuity application., #3 Exhibit 3: Letter dated November 9, 1992, #4 Exhibit 4: Power of Attorney dated May 6, 2006, #5 Exhibit 5: Beneficiary Change Form dated August 23, 2007, #6 Exhibit 6: Beneficiary change request dated September 25, 2007, #7 Exhibit 7: Darrell Bales as the sole primary beneficiary, #8 Exhibit 8: Darrell Bales as the sole primary beneficiary, #9 Exhibit 9: Letters of Conservatorship, #10 Exhibit 10: Letter re: request to dispute the validity of the current beneficiaries)(Burnite, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.