Gilbert v. Mendez et al
Darren Gilbert |
Lourdes Mendez and Stefanie Jasmine Chavez Valencia Doing business as Carniceria La Chaparrita #2 |
1:2022cv00066 |
January 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Stanley A Boone |
Jennifer L Thurston |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Stefanie Jasmine Chavez Valencia served on 2/23/2022, answer due 3/16/2022. (Moore, Tanya) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Lourdes Mendez served on 2/22/2022, answer due 3/15/2022. (Moore, Tanya) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 4/18/2022 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Stefanie Jasmine Chavez Valencia, Lourdes Mendez* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Tanya E. Moore* *300 S. First Street* *Suite 342* *San Jose, CA 95113*. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Asserting Denial of Right of Access Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) against All Defendants by Darren Gilbert. Attorney Moore, Tanya E. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10025724) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, Tanya) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.