(PC) Roberts v. State of California et al
| 1:2022cv00131 |
| February 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER DISMISSING Action Due to Plaintiff's Failure to Pay Filing Fee, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/17/2022. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; ORDER ADOPTING 11 Findings and Recommendations; this matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with this order, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/06/2022. (Pay Filing Fee in full within 30-Day Deadline)(Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
11
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Deny Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 4/13/2022. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd. Objections to F&R due within Fourteen Days. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER of INTRADISTRCT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:21-cv-2395 DMC PC) to Fresno (1:22-cv-0131 HBK PC) signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 2/1/2022. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PC) Roberts v. State of California et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
