Bartel et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Amanda Bartel and David Bartel
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation and Pactiv Packaging, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00134
Filed: January 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: BakersfieldMJ
Referring Judge: Dale A Drozd
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2022 Filing 6 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Starbucks Corporation. Attorney Miller, Robert James added.(Miller, Robert)
March 18, 2022 Filing 5 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Pactiv Packaging, Inc.. Attorney Miller, Robert James added.(Miller, Robert)
February 2, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF TEMPORARY MAGISTRATE JUDGE REFERRAL: Due to the elevation of Judge Jennifer L. Thurston to the position of U.S. District Judge, this action is temporarily referred to *Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone* until such time as a new Bakersfield magistrate judge is appointed. Documents filed in this case shall include the temporary magistrate judge initials *(SAB)* (Marrujo, C)
February 2, 2022 Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 5/2/2022 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Worksheet, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Marrujo, C)
February 2, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Pactiv Packaging, Inc., Starbucks Corporation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Whitney Aaron Davis* *Davis Trial Counsel* *100 Crescent Court, 7th floor* *Dallas, TX 75201*. (Marrujo, C)
January 31, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pactiv Packaging, Inc., Starbucks Corporation by Amanda Bartel, David Bartel. Attorney Davis, Whitney Aaron added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BCAEDC-10052165) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davis, Whitney)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bartel et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Bartel
Represented By: Whitney Aaron Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Bartel
Represented By: Whitney Aaron Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Represented By: Robert James Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pactiv Packaging, Inc.
Represented By: Robert James Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?