Hernandez Lovo v. Internal Revenue Service
| Cristian Yovani Hernandez Lovo |
| Internal Revenue Service |
| 1:2022cv00220 |
| February 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Stanley A Boone |
| Anthony W Ishii |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 6 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 4/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion to Proceed IFP; ORDER DIRECTING payment of Inmate Filing Fee by Michigan Department of Corrections and Directing Clerk of the Court to Issue Prisoner New Case Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 03/21/2022. (Certified Copy of Trust Account due within 60-Day Deadline) (Attachments: #1 IFP Application)(Martin-Gill, S)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Cristian Yovani Hernandez Lovo. (Maldonado, C) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Maldonado, C) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED APPLICATION WITHIN THIRTY DAYS signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/24/2022. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Plaintiff's application is HEREBY DENIED without prejudice. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file an application to proceed in forma pauperis which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement showing transactions for the past six months. Failure to file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis in compliance with this order will result in the recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Gonzales, V)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, served on Cristian Yovani Hernandez Lovo. (Gonzales, V) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Cristian Yovani Hernandez Lovo. (Maldonado, C) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Internal Revenue Service by Cristian Yovani Hernandez Lovo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Maldonado, C) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Maldonado, C) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hernandez Lovo v. Internal Revenue Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cristian Yovani Hernandez Lovo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Internal Revenue Service | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
