(PC) Arthur v. Unknown
| Michael D Arthur |
| Unknown |
| 1:2022cv00279 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Gary S Austin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS: "Same as currently listed on docket" by Michael D Arthur. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS to P.O. Box 2696, California City, Ca 93504 by Michael D Arthur. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER to Submit Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Pay $402.00 Filing Fee within 45 Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 03/11/2022. (Motion for IFP or Filing Fee due within 45-Day Deadline) (Attachments: #1 IFP Application)(Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order, served on Michael D Arthur. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 6
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due within 30 days. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Rivera, O)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Michael D Arthur. (Rivera, O)
|
|
Filing 5
CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of California Central; Case Number 2:22-cv-01538.
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE by Judge Percy Anderson, In the interest of justice and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The Clerk of the Court shall transfer this action forthwith. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (es) [Transferred from cacd on 3/9/2022.]
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (rolm) [Transferred from cacd on 3/9/2022.]
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93). (rolm) [Transferred from cacd on 3/9/2022.]
|
|
Filing 1
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendant Unknown pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, filed by plaintiff Michael D Arthur. (rolm) [Transferred from cacd on 3/9/2022.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PC) Arthur v. Unknown | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael D Arthur | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Unknown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
