Heitkoetter et al v. Domm
Markus Heitkoetter and Rockwell Trading Services, LLC |
Karl Domm |
1:2022cv00368 |
March 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Anthony W Ishii |
Barbara A McAuliffe |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assualt,Slander |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 RESPONSE by Karl Domm to #17 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. (Arani, Susanne) |
Filing 17 MOTION Evidentiary Objections re #9 Motion to Dismiss, by Markus Heitkoetter, Rockwell Trading Services, LLC. (Stebbins, Andrew) |
Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER: (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) The Court has deemed the MOTION TO DISMISS, Doc. No. #9 , noticed for hearing on 6/27/2022, before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii, suitable for decision WITHOUT oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). As such, the hearing on same is VACATED and the matter will be taken under submission as of that date. Minute order signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/23/2022. (Apodaca, P) |
Filing 15 REPLY by Karl Domm re #9 Motion to Dismiss, #13 Opposition to Motion,. (Arani, Susanne) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF LODGING DOCUMENT(S) IN PAPER by Markus Heitkoetter, Rockwell Trading Services, LLC: EXHIBIT 2 TO THE DECLARATION OF ANDREW C. STEBBINS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE AND MOTION TO DISMISS (DKT. 13-2). (Wellman, Max) |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT of Exhibit 2 (Video on USB) from Plaintiffs re #14 Notice of Lodging. (Text only entry) (Jessen, A) |
Filing 13 OPPOSITION by Markus Heitkoetter, Rockwell Trading Services, LLC to #9 Motion to Dismiss,. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF MARKUS HEITKOETTER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE, #2 Declaration OF ANDREW STEBBINS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE)(Wellman, Max) |
Filing 12 ORDER re: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR #9 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE, AND TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY DEADLINES, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on May 17, 2022. June 6, 2022 motion hearing is CONTINUED to June 27, 2022 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Opposition due by June 10, 2022. Reply due by June 21, 2022. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER (TEXT Only): Due the status of this case, the Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE currently set for 6/28/2022 is continued to November 1, 2022, at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. The parties shall file a Joint Scheduling Report one week prior to the conference. The parties shall appear at the conference with each party connecting remotely either via Zoom video conference or Zoom telephone number. The parties will be provided with the Zoom ID and password by the Courtroom Deputy prior to the conference. The Zoom ID number and password are confidential and are not to be shared. Appropriate court attire required. NOTE: Motion to Dismiss (Docs. #9 ) pending. Minute order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/18/2022. (Valdez, E) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for THE CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE, AND TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY DEADLINES re #9 MOTION to DISMISS by Markus Heitkoetter, Rockwell Trading Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wellman, Max) |
Filing 9 MOTION to DISMISS by Karl Domm. Attorney Arani, Susanne G. added. Motion Hearing set for 6/6/2022 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration Declaration and Exhibits, #3 Notice Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Notice Notice of Lodging Exhibit)(Arani, Susanne) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Karl Domm served on 4/7/2022, answer due 4/28/2022. (Wellman, Max) |
Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #6 Application for Pro Hac Vice, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 04/1/2022. Added attorney Andrew Stebbins, PHV for Markus Heitkoetter and Rockwell Trading Services, LLC. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 6 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Markus Heitkoetter, Rockwell Trading Services, LLC for attorney Andrew Clark Stebbins to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-10152146) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Record Certificate of Good Standing (Andrew Clark Stebbins))(Wellman, Max) |
Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 6/28/2022 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Jessen, A) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Karl Domm* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Max Noah Wellman* *Venable LLP* *2049 Century Park East, 23rd Floor* *Los Angeles, CA 90067*. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiffs Markus Heitkoetter, Rockwell Trading Services, LLC. (Wellman, Max) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Markus Heitkoetter, Rockwell Trading Services, LLC (Wellman, Max) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Karl Domm by Markus Heitkoetter, Rockwell Trading Services, LLC. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10147548) (Wellman, Max) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.