(PC)Hagan v. Recarey et al
Kevin Hagan |
Raul Recarey, Warden Landon Bird and Kathleen Allison |
1:2022cv00562 |
May 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Erica P Grosjean |
Anthony W Ishii |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER Regarding Early Settlement Conference; ORDER Directing Clerk to Serve Supervising Attorney General Lawrence Bragg with a Copy of: 1) Plaintiff's Complaint ECF No. 1); and 2) this Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 06/13/2022. Forty-Five Day Deadline. (Flores, E) |
Filing 12 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to Kathleen Allison on 5/16/2022, Answer due 7/15/2022; Landon Bird on 5/16/2022, Answer due 7/15/2022 (Grecea, Neculai) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF INTENT TO WAIVE SERVICE by defendant(s) Raul Recarey, Landon Bird, Kathleen Allison. AG Waiver of Service due in 30 days. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting in part Plaintiff's Motion for Order directing U.S. Marshals to serve Summons and Complaint and directing Service #6 signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/12/2022. FINDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE AND DIRECTING E-SERVICE on the following defendant(s): *Raul Recarey*, *Landon Bird*,*Kathleen Allison*. Operative Complaint, Summons, Notice of E-Service Waiver and this Order served via email on CDCR. (Attachments: #1 Notice) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on May 12, 2022: On May 11, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to allow his counsel to appear remotely at the Initial Scheduling Conference on September 13, 2022, and any other hearings scheduled before then (Doc. #7 ). The same day, Plaintiff filed a notice of withdrawal of the motion (Doc. #8 ). In light of the notice of withdrawal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion (Doc. #7 ) requesting remote appearance is DENIED as moot. (Text Only Entry)(Rooney, M) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Request by Kevin Hagan re #7 REQUEST for Plaintiff's Counsel to Appear Remotely by Kevin Hagan re #4 Civil New Case Documents for AWI.. (Rudin, Benjamin) |
Filing 7 REQUEST for Plaintiff's Counsel to Appear Remotely by Kevin Hagan re #4 Civil New Case Documents for AWI. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rudin, Benjamin) |
Filing 6 REQUEST for Order for U.S. Marshals to Serve Defendants by Kevin Hagan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rudin, Benjamin) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Kathleen Allison, Landon Bird, Raul Recarey* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Benjamin Meir Rudin* *Ben Rudin, Attorney & Counselor at Law* *3830 Valley Centre Dr., Suite 705, PMB 231* *San Diego, CA 92130*. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 9/13/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Martin-Gill, S) |
RECEIPT number ACAEDC-10221629 for $402.00 for Filing Fee from Benjamin Meir Rudin. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED ORDER re Temporary Restraining Order re #1 Complaint. (Rudin, Benjamin) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Kevin Hagan (Rudin, Benjamin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Verified against All Defendants by Kevin Hagan. Attorney Rudin, Benjamin Meir added. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of TRO, #2 Trust Statement, #3 Exhibit)(Rudin, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.