U.S. Bank v. Langley-Miller et al
U.S. Bank |
Judy K Langley-Miller, Anthony Ravall, Lyndon Pita, Daniel Damiano and Rebeca Albain |
1:2022cv00798 |
June 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Dale A Drozd |
Sheila K Oberto |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER Sua Sponte Remanding Case to Tulare County Superior Court and Denying Motions to proceed In Forma Pauperis as moot #3 , #4 signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/1/2022. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order served on Rebeca Albain and Judy K Langley-Miller. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The new case number is: 1:22-cv-00798-DAD-SKO. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 4 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Rebeca Albain. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 3 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judy K Langley-Miller. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Rebeca Albain, Judy K Langley-Miller. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Tulare County Superior Court, Case number 195226 filed by Judy K Langley-Miller, Rebeca Albain. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lundstrom, T) |
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Lundstrom, T) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.