Hormel Foods Corporation Hourly Employees' Pension Plan, et al. v. Perez
| Hormel Foods Corporation Hourly Employees' Pension Plan and Hormel Foods Corporation |
| Marie E. Perez |
| 1:2022cv00879 |
| July 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 11/3/2022 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Marie E. Perez* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Patricia Anne Welch* *Dorsey and Whitney LLP* *1717 Embarcadero Road* *Palo Alto, CA 94303*. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET by Hormel Foods Corporation, Hormel Foods Corporation Hourly Employees' Pension Plan (Welch, Patricia)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Marie E. Perez by Hormel Foods Corporation Hourly Employees' Pension Plan, Hormel Foods Corporation. Attorney Welch, Patricia Anne added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BCAEDC-10331428) (Welch, Patricia)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
