(HC) Garrett v. Moore et al
Petitioner: Charles Devon Garrett
Respondent: Shawn Moore and The Attorney General of the State of California
Case Number: 1:2022cv00899
Filed: July 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Helena M Barch-Kuchta
Referring Judge: Jennifer L Thurston
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 LODGED Amended Petition for Collateral Relief by Charles Devon Garrett. (Maldonado, C)
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION for Release of Bail or own Recognizance Pending Resolution of Petition by Charles Devon Garrett. (Maldonado, C)
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston and Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta. The new case number is: 1:22-cv-00899-JLT-HBK-(HC). (Lundstrom, T)
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Lundstrom, T)
July 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Standing Order issued re Petition filed on *6/10/2022* *(Doc. No. 1).* Consent or Decline due by 8/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Standing Order) (Flores, E)
July 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of California Southern; Case Number 3:22-cv-00864.
July 20, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #11 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Charles Devon Garrett. (Flores, E)
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Case transferred to District of Eastern District of California. Files transferred electronically to: *Eastern District of California*.*501 I Street**Sacramento, CA 95814*. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 7/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf) [Transferred from casd on 7/20/2022.]
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles Devon Garrett. (smy1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/14/2022: #1 Envelope). Modified on 7/14/2022 to add envelope (smy1). [Transferred from casd on 7/20/2022.]
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number CAS139258, Paid on 7/12/2022 (smy1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/14/2022: #1 Envelope). Modified on 7/14/2022 to add envelope (smy1). [Transferred from casd on 7/20/2022.]
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Charles Devon Garrett. (smy1) [Transferred from casd on 7/20/2022.]
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Discovery by Charles Devon Garrett. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(smy1) [Transferred from casd on 7/20/2022.]
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Status Update on Payment by Charles Devon Garrett. (smy1) [Transferred from casd on 7/20/2022.]
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS against Shawn Moore, filed by Charles Devon Garrett. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Appendix A, #3 Appendix B) (smy1) [Transferred from casd on 7/20/2022.]
June 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing by Charles Devon Garrett. (smy1) [Transferred from casd on 7/20/2022.]
June 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Shawn Moore, The Attorney General of the State of California (Filing fee $5, fee not paid, IFP not filed.), filed by Charles Devon Garrett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Procedural History Exhibits 1-12, #3 Exhibits A-C, #4 Exhibits D-F, #5 Exhibits G-I, #6 Exhibits J-L, #7 Exhibits M-O, #8 Exhibits P-R, #9 Exhibits S-U, #10 Exhibits V-X, #11 Exhibits Y and Z, #12 Exhibits 1-5, #13 Exhibits 6-10, #14 Exhibits 11-15, #15 Exhibits 16-21, #16 Appendix A, #17 Appendix B)The new case number is 3:22-cv-864-JLS-BGS. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case.(smy1) [Transferred from casd on 7/20/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Garrett v. Moore et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles Devon Garrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Shawn Moore
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The Attorney General of the State of California
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?